Parallel Processing of Objects in a Naming Task.

The authors investigated whether speakers who named several objects processed them sequentially or in parallel. Speakers named object triplets, arranged in a triangle, in the order left, right, and bottom object. The left object was easy or difficult to identify and name. During the saccade from the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition Vol. 34; no. 4; pp. 982 - 988
Main Authors: Meyer, Antje S., Ouellet, Marc, Häcker, Christine
Format: Article
Published: American Psychological Association July 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=508075223&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 508075223
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02787393
        EXL
      jtl: Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition
      issn: 02787393
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: July 2008
      vid: 34
      iid: 4
      pid: 34
      pub: American Psychological Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        508075223
        10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.982
      ppf: 982
      ppct: 6
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Parallel Processing of Objects in a Naming Task.
      aug:
        au:
          Meyer, Antje S.
          Ouellet, Marc
          Häcker, Christine
      su:
        Attention
        Eye movements
        Reaction time
        Picture perception
      sug:
        subj:
          Attention
          Eye movements
          Reaction time
          Picture perception
      ab: The authors investigated whether speakers who named several objects processed them sequentially or in parallel. Speakers named object triplets, arranged in a triangle, in the order left, right, and bottom object. The left object was easy or difficult to identify and name. During the saccade from the left to the right object, the right object shown at trial onset (the interloper) was replaced by a new object (the target), which the speakers named. Interloper and target were identical or unrelated objects, or they were conceptually unrelated objects with the same name (e.g., bat [animal] and [baseball] bat). The mean duration of the gazes to the target was shorter when interloper and target were identical or had the same name than when they were unrelated. The facilitatory effects of identical and homophonous interlopers were significantly larger when the left object was easy to process than when it was difficult to process. This interaction demonstrates that the speakers processed the left and right objects in parallel. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N