Trait and State Approaches to Explaining Argument Structures.
This study examines how an individual's argumentative communication traits and involvement, a situational factor, account for the way the individual structures his or her written argument. Research questions were posited to ask which of the 3 models — the Interaction Model, the Mediation Model, and...
| Publicado en: | Communication Quarterly Vol. 59; no. 1; pp. 123 - 144 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
January/March 2011
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=508177766&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 508177766 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01463373 CQT jtl: Communication Quarterly issn: 01463373 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: January/March 2011 vid: 59 iid: 1 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 508177766 10.1080/01463373.2011.541365 ppf: 123 ppct: 21 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 106KB tig: atl: Trait and State Approaches to Explaining Argument Structures. aug: au: Suzuki, Shinobu su: Personality Argument Situation (Philosophy) sug: subj: Personality Argument Situation (Philosophy) ab: This study examines how an individual's argumentative communication traits and involvement, a situational factor, account for the way the individual structures his or her written argument. Research questions were posited to ask which of the 3 models — the Interaction Model, the Mediation Model, and the Simple Main Effects Model — best predicts the use of macro- and micro-structures of written argument. Logistic and multiple regression analyses were conducted to analyze 229 usable responses collected from Japanese college students. The results revealed that the Mediation Model and the Simple Main Effects Model are viable models. Argumentative traits and involvement interrelate to explain argument structures, revealing a somewhat complex but interpretable mechanism. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|