Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory.
Murray Sidman's view of stimulus equivalence as a basic stimulus function, and his preference for a largely procedural approach to the study of equivalence is outlined. Steven Hayes's relational frame account, which considers the equivalence relation as one of a number of derived stimulus functions...
| Publicado en: | Psychological Record Vol. 44; pp. 91 - 125 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Psychological Record
Winter94
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=508505213&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 508505213 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00332933 PSD jtl: Psychological Record issn: 00332933 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Winter94 vid: 44 pid: 761 pub: Psychological Record artinfo: ui: 508505213 ppf: 91 ppct: 34 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: T tig: atl: Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. aug: au: Barnes, Dermot su: Association of ideas Stimulus & response (Biology) sug: subj: Association of ideas Stimulus & response (Biology) keyword: Association (Psychology) ab: Murray Sidman's view of stimulus equivalence as a basic stimulus function, and his preference for a largely procedural approach to the study of equivalence is outlined. Steven Hayes's relational frame account, which considers the equivalence relation as one of a number of derived stimulus functions, is also examined. The empirical implications arising from the main differences between these two accounts are discussed. Although relational frame theory does appear to readily predict at least one equivalence effect that Sidman's approach does not, it is still too early to decide which account is better. Reviewing the differences between these two accounts, however, should help to prevent conceptual and empirical confusion in future research. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|