Measuring the composition of voluntary groups: a multitrait-multimethod analysis.

Data on a sample of 128 face-to-face voluntary groups are analyzed with the multitrait-multimethod approach. The traits measured include four characteristics: size, sex composition, age composition, and educational composition. These four traits are measured with three different methods: reports...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Social Forces (University of North Carolina Press) Vol. 73; pp. 1097 - 1116
Autores principales: McPherson, J. Miller, Rotolo, Thomas
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / UK March 1995
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=508549138&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 508549138
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00377732
        SFR
      jtl: Social Forces (University of North Carolina Press)
      issn: 00377732
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: March 1995
      vid: 73
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / UK
    artinfo:
      ui:
        508549138
        10.2307/2580559
      ppf: 1097
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.4MB
      tig:
        atl: Measuring the composition of voluntary groups: a multitrait-multimethod analysis.
      aug:
        au:
          McPherson, J. Miller
          Rotolo, Thomas
      su:
        Volunteer service
        Organizational sociology
      sug:
        subj:
          Volunteer service
          Organizational sociology
      ab: Data on a sample of 128 face-to-face voluntary groups are analyzed with the multitrait-multimethod approach. The traits measured include four characteristics: size, sex composition, age composition, and educational composition. These four traits are measured with three different methods: reports from a respondent chosen through a probability sample from the community, reports from an official of the group, and estimates from direct measurement of the traits at an organizational meeting. Results of the analysis suggest that the three measures are parallel with one another in the sense of Lord and Novich 1968. This result means that the three methods are equally desirable. Surprisingly, the direct canvass measure does not appear to be more reliable than the others; on the contrary, it appears to be equivalent to other reports for the traits measured. There is a slight suggestion in the data that officials in the group are more accurate than ordinary respondents in reporting information about less salient characteristics of the members, such as years of education. In general, the three methods of gathering data appear to be equally reliable, although they measure slightly different aspects of group composition. Copyright 1995, University of North Carolina press.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N