Issues in training family scientists.

Part of a special issue on recent developments and future directions in helping contemporary families. The writers discuss issues associated with graduate education in family science, particularly at the doctoral level. Using Boyer's four types of scholarship—discovery, integration, application, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Family Relations Vol. 44; pp. 501 - 508
Autores principales: Ganong, Lawrence H., Coleman, Marilyn, Demo, David H.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell October 1995
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=508571292&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 508571292
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01976664
        FMR
      jtl: Family Relations
      issn: 01976664
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: October 1995
      vid: 44
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        508571292
        10.2307/585004
      ppf: 501
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 928KB
      tig:
        atl: Issues in training family scientists.
      aug:
        au:
          Ganong, Lawrence H.
          Coleman, Marilyn
          Demo, David H.
      su:
        Graduate education
        Family studies
      sug:
        subj:
          Graduate education
          Family studies
      ab: Part of a special issue on recent developments and future directions in helping contemporary families. The writers discuss issues associated with graduate education in family science, particularly at the doctoral level. Using Boyer's four types of scholarship—discovery, integration, application, and teaching—as a framework, they examine the competencies that family scientists should possess and the experiences required to help students obtain such competencies. In addition, they propose ideas for a core curriculum for family science doctoral study, describe controversies and unresolved issues, and consider the training of family scientists for the future.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N