Juggling law, ethics, and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions.

The eclectic problem solving methodology used by the British Medical Association (BMA) is described in this paper. It has grown from the daily need to respond to doctors' practical queries and incorporates reference to law, traditional professional codes, and established BMA policies—all of which m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Medical Ethics Vol. 29; no. 5; pp. 281 - 287
Autor principal: Sommerville, A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group October 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=508868866&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 508868866
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03066800
        MET
      jtl: Journal of Medical Ethics
      issn: 03066800
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: October 2003
      vid: 29
      iid: 5
      pid: 8280
      pub: BMJ Publishing Group
    artinfo:
      ui:
        508868866
        10.1136/jme.29.5.281
      ppf: 281
      ppct: 6
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Juggling law, ethics, and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions.
      aug:
        au: Sommerville, A.
      su:
        British Medical Association
        Medical ethics
        Medical laws
        United Kingdom
      sug:
        subj:
          United Kingdom
          British Medical Association
          Medical ethics
          Medical laws
      ab: The eclectic problem solving methodology used by the British Medical Association (BMA) is described in this paper. It has grown from the daily need to respond to doctors' practical queries and incorporates reference to law, traditional professional codes, and established BMA policies—all of which must be regularly assessed against the benchmark of contemporary societal expectations. The two Jehovah's Witness scenarios are analysed, using this methodology and in both cases the four principles solution is found to concur with that of the BMA's approach. The author's overall conclusion is that although the BMA resorts to a lengthier list of things to consider, the solutions that emerge are often likely to coincide with the four principles approach. Reprinted by permission of the BMJ Publishing Group.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N