The suppressed legacy of Nuremberg.

The triumphalist recitation of the self-determination ideal in doctor–patient relations, which traces its lineage back to the 1947 Nuremberg trials of Nazi physicians, masks a darker legacy. Following 133 days of testimony about the barbarities committed by doctors in German concentration camps, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Hastings Center Report Vol. 26; pp. 30 - 34
Autor principal: Burt, Robert A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Hastings Center September/October 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=509180506&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 509180506
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00930334
        HCR
      jtl: Hastings Center Report
      issn: 00930334
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: September/October 1996
      vid: 26
      pid: 386
      pub: Hastings Center
    artinfo:
      ui:
        509180506
        10.2307/3528468
      ppf: 30
      ppct: 4
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: The suppressed legacy of Nuremberg.
      aug:
        au: Burt, Robert A.
      su:
        Physician-patient relations
        Medical experimentation on humans
        Nuremberg War Crime Trials, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1949
        Informed consent (Medical law)
      sug:
        subj:
          Physician-patient relations
          Medical experimentation on humans
          Nuremberg War Crime Trials, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1949
          Informed consent (Medical law)
      ab: The triumphalist recitation of the self-determination ideal in doctor–patient relations, which traces its lineage back to the 1947 Nuremberg trials of Nazi physicians, masks a darker legacy. Following 133 days of testimony about the barbarities committed by doctors in German concentration camps, the Nuremberg judges established the individual subject–patient armed with the principle of self-determination as the first line of defense against a recurrence of such inhuman activities. In so doing, they implied that the self-restraining decency of traditional embodiments of social authority could not be relied upon for protection of the individual. This same underlying sense of betrayal and helpless vulnerability can be seen to inform contemporary American invocations of the self-determination ideal in doctor–patient relations, most compellingly in current arguments for a right to physician-assisted suicide. It would appear that the most enduring legacy of the Nuremberg doctors' trial is the vision of once-trusted caretakers acting as heartless predators.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N