Goldsmith and the ‘British Magazine’: A reconsideration.
Twenty-eight items in the British Magazine have been attributed to Goldsmith, the majority in Essays and Criticisms by Dr. Goldsmith (1798). The strength of the external evidence depends on the authority of that collection; it is shakier than its editor claimed. Internal evidence comes from a Goldsm...
| Publicado en: | Literary & Linguistic Computing Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 243 - 264 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Jun2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=50986032&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 50986032 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 02681145 BJ1 jtl: Literary & Linguistic Computing issn: 02681145 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2010 vid: 25 iid: 2 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 50986032 10.1093/llc/fqp040 ppf: 243 ppct: 21 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 183KB tig: atl: Goldsmith and the ‘British Magazine’: A reconsideration. aug: au: Dixon, Peter Mannion, David affil: Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London, UK Royal Holloway, University of London, UK su: Attribution of authorship Essays Goldsmith, Oliver, ca. 1730-1774 Authors Periodicals Journalists sug: subj: Attribution of authorship Essays Goldsmith, Oliver, ca. 1730-1774 Authors Periodicals Journalists ab: Twenty-eight items in the British Magazine have been attributed to Goldsmith, the majority in Essays and Criticisms by Dr. Goldsmith (1798). The strength of the external evidence depends on the authority of that collection; it is shakier than its editor claimed. Internal evidence comes from a Goldsmith ‘profile’ of stylistic features, established by reference to contemporary essayists, from measures of sentence-length, distinctive features of the attributed essays, and parallels of word and thought. We conclude that most of the attributed essays, including those proposed since 1798, are unlikely to be Goldsmith's. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: © 2019 EADH: The European Association for Digital Humanities. item: Literary & Linguistic Computing holder: Oxford University Press / USA dt: @attributes: year: 2010 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|