How much is too much? Dependency in a psychotherapeutic relationship.

A report on a case that documents an extreme example of “fostered dependency.” After 18 years of psychoanalysis, which eventually reached eight to ten sessions per week, the patient sought legal redress and compensation for negligent treatment. The lawsuit claimed that continued psychotherapy initi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Psychotherapy Vol. 48; pp. 294 - 302
Autores principales: Abramson, Paul R., Cloud, Monique Y., Keese, Natalie
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Association for the Advancement of Psychotherapy Spring 1994
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510108688&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510108688
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00029564
        ATC
      jtl: American Journal of Psychotherapy
      issn: 00029564
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring 1994
      vid: 48
      pid: 520
      pub: Association for the Advancement of Psychotherapy
    artinfo:
      ui: 510108688
      ppf: 294
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: How much is too much? Dependency in a psychotherapeutic relationship.
      aug:
        au:
          Abramson, Paul R.
          Cloud, Monique Y.
          Keese, Natalie
      su:
        Professional ethics of psychotherapists
        Psychotherapy
      sug:
        subj:
          Professional ethics of psychotherapists
          Psychotherapy
      ab: A report on a case that documents an extreme example of “fostered dependency.” After 18 years of psychoanalysis, which eventually reached eight to ten sessions per week, the patient sought legal redress and compensation for negligent treatment. The lawsuit claimed that continued psychotherapy initially created, and then unduly fostered, dependency. Other problems referred to were dual relationships, confused boundaries, excessive sessions, exorbitant fees, length of treatment, failure to keep records, failure to identify goals, and failure to keep therapy focused on the patient's well-being. This case is an example of the extent to which dependency can be created and manipulated. It suggests a strategy whereby the profession can facilitate a patient's rights and raises a number of broader issues about the conduct and ethics of psychotherapy.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N