Science, Sulloway, and Birth Order: An Ordeal and an Assessment.

This issue of Politics and the Life Sciences includes an article, ten commentaries, and three responses on the subject of birth order and rebelliousness, focusing in particular on Frank Sulloway's Born to Rebel (1996, 1997). Extraordinary events have surrounded the publication of this roundtable, in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Politics & the Life Sciences Vol. 19; no. 2; pp. 211 - 246
Autor principal: Johnson, Gary R.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Association for Politics & the Life Sciences September 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510119756&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510119756
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07309384
        PFC
      jtl: Politics & the Life Sciences
      issn: 07309384
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: September 2000
      vid: 19
      iid: 2
      pid: 15955
      pub: Association for Politics & the Life Sciences
    artinfo:
      ui: 510119756
      ppf: 211
      ppct: 35
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Science, Sulloway, and Birth Order: An Ordeal and an Assessment.
      aug:
        au: Johnson, Gary R.
      su:
        Sulloway, Frank J.
        Politics & the Life Sciences (Periodical)
        Birth order
      sug:
        subj:
          Birth order
          Politics & the Life Sciences (Periodical)
          Sulloway, Frank J.
      ab: This issue of Politics and the Life Sciences includes an article, ten commentaries, and three responses on the subject of birth order and rebelliousness, focusing in particular on Frank Sulloway's Born to Rebel (1996, 1997). Extraordinary events have surrounded the publication of this roundtable, including threats of legal action, accusations of misconduct, letters to university officials, termination of the journal's publishing contract, and an almost five-year delay in publication. This editorial reviews these events and goes on to assess Frank Sulloway's responses (published in this issue), as well as parts of Born to Rebel. It also reports the results of a replication of Sulloway's study of Reformation martyrs. The replication generated markedly different data than those reported by Sulloway. Data from an expanded sample were also inconsistent with the relationship that Sulloway reported finding between birth order and religious commitment among Reformation martyrs. The editorial supports the suggestion by Frederic Townsend that an independent review of Born to Rebel would be appropriate. It concludes with a call for establishment of a multidisciplinary legal defense fund that would reduce the likelihood that legal threats can succeed in stifling research and publication in the natural and social sciences. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N