Born to Rebel and Its Critics.

Frederic Townsend's critique of Born to Rebel (Sulloway, 1996) is based on an unfortunate pattern of misrepresentation and faulty empirical methods. First, the historical data in Born to Rebel are neither unrepresentative nor undisclosed. The were compiled with the help of 110 expert raters, who val...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Politics & the Life Sciences Vol. 19; no. 2; pp. 181 - 203
Autor principal: Sulloway, Frank J.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Association for Politics & the Life Sciences September 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510119759&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510119759
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07309384
        PFC
      jtl: Politics & the Life Sciences
      issn: 07309384
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: September 2000
      vid: 19
      iid: 2
      pid: 15955
      pub: Association for Politics & the Life Sciences
    artinfo:
      ui: 510119759
      ppf: 181
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Born to Rebel and Its Critics.
      aug:
        au: Sulloway, Frank J.
      su:
        Birth order
        Resistance to government
        Personality
        Rating
        Historical research methods
      sug:
        subj:
          Birth order
          Resistance to government
          Personality
          Rating
          Historical research methods
      ab: Frederic Townsend's critique of Born to Rebel (Sulloway, 1996) is based on an unfortunate pattern of misrepresentation and faulty empirical methods. First, the historical data in Born to Rebel are neither unrepresentative nor undisclosed. The were compiled with the help of 110 expert raters, who validated their representative nature and operationalized the principal outcome measures. Second, birth order is moderately associated with political radicalism, especially in real-life and within-family studies. Third, the meta-analytic data are statistically compelling for various behavioral attributes, although effect sizes are generally modest. Fourth, recent studies using large samples and anchored scales demonstrate the influence of birth order on a wide variety of personality traits, especially in within-family comparisons. In addition, the relationship between birth order and openness to radical innovation—highlighted in Born to Rebel—has been replicated by other researchers. Because Townsend fails to employ formal methods of hypothesis testing—relying instead on selected anecdotal examples, adversarial tactics, and an inadequate grasp of statistical principles—he has drawn numerous false conclusions about the influence of birth order. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N