Active engagement: the legacy of Central America solidarity.

Part of a special section on Pan-American solidarity. The Central America solidarity movement in the U.S. is discussed. Despite its small size—it is unlikely that there were ever more than 20,000 Central America activists at any one time—it was a movement of bewildering diversity with an unusually...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:NACLA Report on the Americas Vol. 28; pp. 22 - 30
Main Author: Gosse, Van
Format: Article
Published: North American Congress on Latin America March/April 1995
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510123891&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510123891
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10714839
        SIL
      jtl: NACLA Report on the Americas
      issn: 10714839
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: March/April 1995
      vid: 28
      pid: 2180
      pub: North American Congress on Latin America
    artinfo:
      ui: 510123891
      ppf: 22
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Active engagement: the legacy of Central America solidarity.
      aug:
        au: Gosse, Van
      su:
        Central America-United States relations
        Peace movements
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          Central America-United States relations
          Peace movements
      keyword: Peace movements -- Central America
      ab: Part of a special section on Pan-American solidarity. The Central America solidarity movement in the U.S. is discussed. Despite its small size—it is unlikely that there were ever more than 20,000 Central America activists at any one time—it was a movement of bewildering diversity with an unusually workable mixture of individual and institutional histories and highly developed organizational practices. This pluralism produced a remarkable enthusiasm and tolerance, as individuals usually went where their instincts and talents led them. It constituted an excellent antidote to the type of sectarianism that had occasionally beset the antiwar movement and earlier solidarity efforts with Latin America. It was a movement that was never concerned with whether or not it could change the U.S. itself, but was instead concerned with changing U.S. policy and offering a meaningful level of material aid on the ground in various countries. Various movement activities are discussed.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N