Rights: educational not cultural.

A commentary on Avishai Margalit and Moshe Halbertal's “Liberalism and the Right to Culture,” which appeared in Social Research, vol. 61, 1994, pp. 491-506. The writer contends that the educational program essential to a pluralistic democratic liberal state does not rest on the individual or collec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social Research Vol. 62; pp. 161 - 171
Main Author: Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg
Format: Article
Published: New School for Social Research Spring 1995
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510129711&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510129711
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0037783X
        SRE
      jtl: Social Research
      issn: 0037783X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring 1995
      vid: 62
      pid: 296
      pub: New School for Social Research
    artinfo:
      ui: 510129711
      ppf: 161
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Rights: educational not cultural.
      aug:
        au: Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg
      su:
        Civil rights
        Minorities
        Cultural pluralism
        Liberalism
      sug:
        subj:
          Civil rights
          Minorities
          Cultural pluralism
          Liberalism
      ab: A commentary on Avishai Margalit and Moshe Halbertal's “Liberalism and the Right to Culture,” which appeared in Social Research, vol. 61, 1994, pp. 491-506. The writer contends that the educational program essential to a pluralistic democratic liberal state does not rest on the individual or collective right to the preservation of culture and that a detailed cosmopolitan education is an absolute necessity for the vitality of a genuinely democratic state. The writer asserts that when the state undertakes its educational obligation to provide a rich account of the history, beliefs, and practices of its constituent and neighboring cultures, it undertakes to analyze their dynamic diversity without any misleading essentialist assumptions, but if it undertakes to assist in the preservation of a minority culture, it becomes a participant in the combat over politically charged issues: the closure on cultural essentialism.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N