The second coming of what?

A review of an article entitled “The Second Coming—A Manifesto,” by David Gelernter, is presented. Gelernter, a surviving victim of the Unabomber, continues on from the concepts expressed in his first book in describing a debate about the value of technology from the standpoint of technophile and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Prospect Vol. 11; no. 25; pp. 33 - 36
Autor principal: Blume, Harvey
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Prospect December 4 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510149073&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510149073
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10497285
        ANP
      jtl: American Prospect
      issn: 10497285
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: December 4 2000
      vid: 11
      iid: 25
      pid: 2396
      pub: American Prospect
    artinfo:
      ui: 510149073
      ppf: 33
      ppct: 3
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 514KB
      tig:
        atl: The second coming of what?
      aug:
        au: Blume, Harvey
      su:
        Gelernter, David Hillel, 1955-
        Technology & society
      sug:
        subj:
          Technology & society
          Gelernter, David Hillel, 1955-
      ab: A review of an article entitled “The Second Coming—A Manifesto,” by David Gelernter, is presented. Gelernter, a surviving victim of the Unabomber, continues on from the concepts expressed in his first book in describing a debate about the value of technology from the standpoint of technophile and technophobe. He moves beyond this dichotomy and contends that digital technology will not always disrupt lives with uproar about innovation. The article has the same facility with language and the same abundance of ideas and new angles of attack that are characteristic of Gelernter's writings, but the social theory that he relies upon is not original. Gelernter is an agent of the modernity he disdains, but his constantly reiterated theory of “the coup of the intellectuals” bars him from getting a grasp on the forces shaping America.
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N