The domain specificity and generality of mental contamination: accuracy and projection in judgments of mental content.

In this study we examined individual differences across two tasks requiring people to judge the mental contents of the minds of other people—an opinion prediction task and a knowledge prediction task. The tendency to overproject one's own mental contents in both of these tasks has been interpreted a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Journal of Psychology Vol. 92; no. 2; pp. 281 - 303
Autores principales: Sá, Walter C., Stanovich, Keith
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell May 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510154867&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510154867
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00071269
        BJP
      jtl: British Journal of Psychology
      issn: 00071269
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May 2001
      vid: 92
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510154867
        10.1348/000712601162194
      ppf: 281
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.6MB
      tig:
        atl: The domain specificity and generality of mental contamination: accuracy and projection in judgments of mental content.
      aug:
        au:
          Sá, Walter C.
          Stanovich, Keith
      su:
        Human information processing
        Individual differences
        Reasoning
        Social perception
      sug:
        subj:
          Human information processing
          Individual differences
          Reasoning
          Social perception
      ab: In this study we examined individual differences across two tasks requiring people to judge the mental contents of the minds of other people—an opinion prediction task and a knowledge prediction task. The tendency to overproject one's own mental contents in both of these tasks has been interpreted as an instance of mental contamination by Wilson and Brekke (1994). Results demonstrate no domain generality in the process of projecting one's own internal states onto predictions about the internal states of others. Furthermore, projection was efficacious in the opinion prediction task but not in the knowledge prediction task. The differing consequences of mental contamination across these tasks was moderated by the presence of other diagnostic cues that were negatively correlated with the diagnosticity of one's own mental contents in the knowledge prediction task but not in the opinion prediction task. Mental contamination was largely unrelated to cognitive ability or to styles of epistemic regulation. However, predictive accuracy (and its primary determinant—use of other diagnostic cues) was correlated across the two tasks, and was also related to cognitive ability and styles of epistemic regulation. The results are interpreted within the context of two-process models of cognitive functioning (e.g. Evans & Over, 1996; Sloman, 1996). Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N