The Internet filter farce: why blocking software doesn't—and can't—work as promised.

The writer discusses why Internet filtering software cannot work as promised. He considers reasons why filters might make one uneasy. He points out that in a corporate setting, they restrict employee privacy. With regard to parental restrictions on children's access to information, he asserts tha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:American Prospect Vol. 12; no. 1; pp. 28 - 34
Main Author: Nunberg, Geoffrey
Format: Article
Published: American Prospect January 1-15 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510158391&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510158391
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10497285
        ANP
      jtl: American Prospect
      issn: 10497285
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: January 1-15 2001
      vid: 12
      iid: 1
      pid: 2396
      pub: American Prospect
    artinfo:
      ui: 510158391
      ppf: 28
      ppct: 6
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 871KB
      tig:
        atl: The Internet filter farce: why blocking software doesn't—and can't—work as promised.
      aug:
        au: Nunberg, Geoffrey
      su:
        Filtering software
        Internet & children
        Internet pornography
      sug:
        subj:
          Filtering software
          Internet & children
          Internet pornography
      ab: The writer discusses why Internet filtering software cannot work as promised. He considers reasons why filters might make one uneasy. He points out that in a corporate setting, they restrict employee privacy. With regard to parental restrictions on children's access to information, he asserts that a filtering program has no way of knowing exactly what speech it blocks and that the software firms are doing all they can to keep their customers in the dark. He notes that firms justify their secrecy by citing the need to protect their intellectual property and arguing that publication of the lists of blocked sites would allow children to bypass the filters and access inappropriate materials. However, he argues that their real fear in making the lists public is that it would expose the inadequacy of their software. He considers why filters fail and what should be done to improve them and hold their makers accountable to reasonable standards of public disclosure.
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N