Reform as affirmation: Jimmy Carter's executive branch reorganization effort.
Modern presidents must negotiate the tension between, on one hand, public demands for systemic change and, on the other hand, contextual and institutional constraints that limit their authority and ability to achieve “reconstructive” reforms. Jimmy Carter's executive branch reorganization effort ill...
| Publicado en: | Presidential Studies Quarterly Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. 104 - 121 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
March 2001
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510175525&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 510175525 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 03604918 PRQ jtl: Presidential Studies Quarterly issn: 03604918 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: March 2001 vid: 31 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 510175525 10.1111/j.0360-4918.2001.00158.x ppf: 104 ppct: 17 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.2MB tig: atl: Reform as affirmation: Jimmy Carter's executive branch reorganization effort. aug: au: Seyb, Ronald P. su: Carter, Jimmy, 1924-2024 Decision making in public administration Executive departments Executive department reorganization United States sug: subj: United States Decision making in public administration Executive departments Executive department reorganization Carter, Jimmy, 1924-2024 ab: Modern presidents must negotiate the tension between, on one hand, public demands for systemic change and, on the other hand, contextual and institutional constraints that limit their authority and ability to achieve “reconstructive” reforms. Jimmy Carter's executive branch reorganization effort illustrates how institutional decision-making processes can impede presidents' attempts to pursue innovative approaches to reform. This article maintains that a “garbage can” decision-making process led Carter and his aides to abandon their initial novel “bottom-up” approach to reorganization in favor of the traditional “top-down” structural approach adopted by their predecessors. The article concludes that institutional pressures compelled the recent president most intent on repudiating the past to affirm it. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|