Preserving the Ethical Propriety of Statistical Devices.
C. D. Herrera (1996) introduced an innovative argument against the use of deception in psychological research. In essence, Herrera contended that because of the presumed problems with null hypothesis statistical testing, researchers could not justify their continued use of deception in research. Alt...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Psychology Vol. 136; no. 2; pp. 117 - 125 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
March 2002
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510198339&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 510198339 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00223980 JPY jtl: Journal of Psychology issn: 00223980 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: March 2002 vid: 136 iid: 2 pid: 58221 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 510198339 10.1080/00223980209604143 ppf: 117 ppct: 8 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 512KB tig: atl: Preserving the Ethical Propriety of Statistical Devices. aug: au: Pittenger, David J. su: Statistical hypothesis testing Psychological techniques Psychology -- Statistical methods Psychological research Ethics sug: subj: Statistical hypothesis testing Psychological techniques Psychology -- Statistical methods Psychological research Ethics ab: C. D. Herrera (1996) introduced an innovative argument against the use of deception in psychological research. In essence, Herrera contended that because of the presumed problems with null hypothesis statistical testing, researchers could not justify their continued use of deception in research. Although this is an interesting argument, there are several alternative perspectives that must be considered. In examining these alternatives, the author concluded that psychologists may continue to use deception under certain circumstances outlined in the American Psychological Association's ethical code of conduct. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|