Virtual offensiveness.

A former subscriber to America Online (AOL) has filed a federal lawsuit asserting that AOL disregarded his civil rights by failing to censor hate speech in a chat room. The lawsuit highlights the fact that distinctions between virtual and real worlds are eroding, in that it is easy to understand ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Prospect Vol. 12; no. 20; pp. 34 - 36
Autor principal: Kaminer, Wendy
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Prospect November 19 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510208736&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510208736
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10497285
        ANP
      jtl: American Prospect
      issn: 10497285
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: November 19 2001
      vid: 12
      iid: 20
      pid: 2396
      pub: American Prospect
    artinfo:
      ui: 510208736
      ppf: 34
      ppct: 2
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 236KB
      tig:
        atl: Virtual offensiveness.
      aug:
        au: Kaminer, Wendy
      su:
        America Online Inc.
        Freedom of speech
        Online hate speech
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          America Online Inc.
          Freedom of speech
          Online hate speech
      ab: A former subscriber to America Online (AOL) has filed a federal lawsuit asserting that AOL disregarded his civil rights by failing to censor hate speech in a chat room. The lawsuit highlights the fact that distinctions between virtual and real worlds are eroding, in that it is easy to understand how an AOL chat room might be deemed the equivalent of an actual place. Having unwisely imposed restrictions on “offensive“ speech in its terms-of-service contract, AOL may be liable for failing to try to enforce them. The former AOL subscriber may succeed in establishing his right not to be offended in a chat room, but at the expense of his own right to offend or merely embarrass, anyone else, even unintentionally. It is difficult to conceive of this as a victory for civil rights.
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N