Comparing Choice Question Formats for Evaluating Natural Resource Tradeoffs.

Choice questions are increasingly being used to scale competing natural resource programs. Respondents choose between two alternatives with varying levels of program characteristics and costs. Complexity in the choice task can increase the randomness (variance) in the choices and the estimation of p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Land Economics Vol. 78; no. 2; pp. 298 - 315
Main Authors: Breffle, William S., Rowe, Robert D.
Format: Article
Published: University of Wisconsin Press May 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510218134&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510218134
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00237639
        LAE
      jtl: Land Economics
      issn: 00237639
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May 2002
      vid: 78
      iid: 2
      pid: 249
      pub: University of Wisconsin Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510218134
        10.2307/3147275
      ppf: 298
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.8MB
      tig:
        atl: Comparing Choice Question Formats for Evaluating Natural Resource Tradeoffs.
      aug:
        au:
          Breffle, William S.
          Rowe, Robert D.
      su:
        Social surveys
        Restoration ecology
        Green Bay (Wis.)
      sug:
        subj:
          Green Bay (Wis.)
          Social surveys
          Restoration ecology
      keyword:
        Green Bay (Wis.) -- Environmental policy
        Social surveys -- Format
      ab: Choice questions are increasingly being used to scale competing natural resource programs. Respondents choose between two alternatives with varying levels of program characteristics and costs. Complexity in the choice task can increase the randomness (variance) in the choices and the estimation of preferences, and the magnitude of randomness is examined using scope tests and scale parameters. We provide an empirical comparison of response variance from three formats. A simple resource-to-resource format appears superior to simple referendum and composite formats in terms of coherence. The application stems from a study addressing PCB-caused natural resource losses in Green Bay, Wisconsin. (JEL Q26) Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N