Study Samples Are Too Small to Produce Sufficiently Precise Reliability Coefficients.

In a survey of journal articles, test manuals, and test critique books, the author found that a mean sample size (N) of 260 participants had been used for reliability studies on 742 tests. The distribution was skewed because the median sample size for the total sample was only 90. The median sample...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of General Psychology Vol. 130; no. 2; pp. 117 - 130
Autor principal: Charter, Richard A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd April 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510238730&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510238730
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00221309
        JGP
      jtl: Journal of General Psychology
      issn: 00221309
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: April 2003
      vid: 130
      iid: 2
      pid: 58221
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510238730
        10.1080/00221300309601280
      ppf: 117
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 861KB
      tig:
        atl: Study Samples Are Too Small to Produce Sufficiently Precise Reliability Coefficients.
      aug:
        au: Charter, Richard A.
      su:
        Psychological techniques
        Psychology -- Statistical methods
        Confidence intervals
      sug:
        subj:
          Psychological techniques
          Psychology -- Statistical methods
          Confidence intervals
      ab: In a survey of journal articles, test manuals, and test critique books, the author found that a mean sample size (N) of 260 participants had been used for reliability studies on 742 tests. The distribution was skewed because the median sample size for the total sample was only 90. The median sample sizes for the internal consistency, retest, and interjudge reliabilities were 182, 64, and 36, respectively. The author presented sample size statistics for the various internal consistency methods and types of tests. In general, the author found that the sample sizes that were used in the internal consistency studies were too small to produce sufficiently precise reliability coefficients, which in turn could cause imprecise estimates of examinee true-score confidence intervals. The results also suggest that larger sample sizes have been used in the last decade compared with those that were used in earlier decades. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N