The Polls: Policy-Specific Presidential Approval, Part 2.
Extant research suggests the primacy of economics over foreign policy in determining public evaluations of the president despite the higher degree of presidential responsibility for foreign, as opposed to economic, policy. Lack of good data on foreign policy attitudes has limited the incorporation o...
| Publicado en: | Presidential Studies Quarterly Vol. 32; no. 4; pp. 779 - 789 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
December 2002
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510280016&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 510280016 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 03604918 PRQ jtl: Presidential Studies Quarterly issn: 03604918 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: December 2002 vid: 32 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 510280016 10.1177/0360491802238709 ppf: 779 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 568KB tig: atl: The Polls: Policy-Specific Presidential Approval, Part 2. aug: au: Cohen, Jeffrey E. su: Presidents of the United States Public opinion United States economic policy Foreign relations of the United States sug: subj: Presidents of the United States Public opinion United States economic policy Foreign relations of the United States keyword: Clinton, Bill, 1946- -- Public opinion ab: Extant research suggests the primacy of economics over foreign policy in determining public evaluations of the president despite the higher degree of presidential responsibility for foreign, as opposed to economic, policy. Lack of good data on foreign policy attitudes has limited the incorporation of that aspect of public opinion in the study of presidential approval. In this article, I utilize both foreign and economic policy monthly approval times series that span the two terms of the Clinton administration to study the comparative impact of foreign and economic policy thinking on public approval. Results find, first, that the specific approval series granger cause general presidential approval. Second, economic and foreign policy approval seems to have similar impacts on general presidential approval. Implications for understanding public opinion toward the president and directions for future research are discussed. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|