Science, Religion and a Culture of Life.

For those who wish to affirm a culture that values human life, the relationship between science and religion continues to be of import. Some, like Edward O. Wilson, think that naturalistic science will eventually account for all phenomena, even religious experience itself. This essay considers Wilso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Vol. 15; no. 1/2; pp. 61 - 79
Autor principal: Dilley, Stephen Craig
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Institute for Interdisciplinary Research 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510292529&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510292529
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08900132
        JYU
      jtl: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
      issn: 08900132
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2003
      vid: 15
      iid: 1/2
      pid: 2360
      pub: Institute for Interdisciplinary Research
    artinfo:
      ui: 510292529
      ppf: 61
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 2MB
      tig:
        atl: Science, Religion and a Culture of Life.
      aug:
        au: Dilley, Stephen Craig
      su:
        Wilson, Edward O., 1929-2021
        Science -- Philosophy
        Life
        Philosophy of Christianity
        Christianity & science
      sug:
        subj:
          Science -- Philosophy
          Life
          Philosophy of Christianity
          Christianity & science
          Wilson, Edward O., 1929-2021
      ab: For those who wish to affirm a culture that values human life, the relationship between science and religion continues to be of import. Some, like Edward O. Wilson, think that naturalistic science will eventually account for all phenomena, even religious experience itself. This essay considers Wilson's hypothesis by surveying three classic explanations of universal religious belief: Sigmund Freud's projection theory, Charles Darwin's evolutionary paradigm, and John Calvin's sensus divinitatis. Both Freud's and Darwin's views suffer from self-referential and evidential problems. In contrast, Calvin's model handles well major objections of religious pluralism and atheism. Of these three, Calvin's view is superior. Religion may not be reducible to a naturalistic explanation, and those who wish to promote a culture of life ought to view the relations between science and religion in a non-Wilsonian fashion, eschewing reductionism. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N