How Should We Wage the War on Drugs? Determinants of Public Preferences for Drug Control Alternatives.

When citizens are presented with alternative policy solutions to a given social problem, why do they choose to support one over another? In this article, the authors analyze a survey of residents of the five largest U.S. metropolitan areas to understand determinants of public support for spending on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Policy Studies Journal Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. 71 - 89
Autores principales: Timberlake, Jeffrey M., Lock, Eric D., Rasinski, Kenneth A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell February 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510303379&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510303379
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0190292X
        PSJ
      jtl: Policy Studies Journal
      issn: 0190292X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: February 2003
      vid: 31
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510303379
        10.1111/1541-0072.00004
      ppf: 71
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.1MB
      tig:
        atl: How Should We Wage the War on Drugs? Determinants of Public Preferences for Drug Control Alternatives.
      aug:
        au:
          Timberlake, Jeffrey M.
          Lock, Eric D.
          Rasinski, Kenneth A.
      su:
        Public opinion
        Drug abuse policy
        Drug control
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          Public opinion
          Drug abuse policy
          Drug control
      keyword: Drug abuse -- United States -- Public opinion
      ab: When citizens are presented with alternative policy solutions to a given social problem, why do they choose to support one over another? In this article, the authors analyze a survey of residents of the five largest U.S. metropolitan areas to understand determinants of public support for spending on three major components of American drug control policy: law enforcement programs, rehabilitative services for addicts, and school-based prevention programs. The authors estimate effects of self-interest, political socialization, and policy attitudes on support for total drug control expenditures and on preferences for each drug control alternative versus the others. Effects of group self-interest, societal interest, and political socialization change dramatically across dimensions of support. Policy attitudes are strong predictors of both types of support, whereas individual self-interest measures are not associated with either dimension. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N