Adults' versus children's performance on the Stroop task: Interference and facilitation.

Stroop tasks (Stroop, 1935) present stimuli having two dimensions, and participants respond to one dimension whilst ignoring the other. The two dimensions are made congruent, incongruent or neutral with respect to one another. Many claim that ‘Stroop interference’ is higher in children than in adult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Journal of Psychology Vol. 94; no. 4; pp. 475 - 486
Autores principales: Wright, Barlow C., Wanley, Amanda
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell November 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510307845&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510307845
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00071269
        BJP
      jtl: British Journal of Psychology
      issn: 00071269
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: November 2003
      vid: 94
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510307845
        10.1348/000712603322503042
      ppf: 475
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 881KB
      tig:
        atl: Adults' versus children's performance on the Stroop task: Interference and facilitation.
      aug:
        au:
          Wright, Barlow C.
          Wanley, Amanda
      su:
        Age (Psychology)
        Stroop Color & Word Test
      sug:
        subj:
          Age (Psychology)
          Stroop Color & Word Test
      ab: Stroop tasks (Stroop, 1935) present stimuli having two dimensions, and participants respond to one dimension whilst ignoring the other. The two dimensions are made congruent, incongruent or neutral with respect to one another. Many claim that ‘Stroop interference’ is higher in children than in adults. However, taking interference as the difference between the incongruent condition and the neutral condition, with interference within the congruent condition itself termed the ‘incongruity effect’ then surprisingly few studies directly address this issue. Also, there is recent debate as to whether the ‘facilitation effect’ (the contrast between the congruent and neutral conditions) is just the opposite of interference. The present investigation (N = 31) concerned a direct comparison between children and adults. Although the incongruity effect reduced with age, interference did not. However, facilitation was far higher in children than in adults. The groups' opposite facilitation/interference asymmetry was used to examine the recent claim that these derive from inadvertent word-reading and suppression of semantic activation, respectively; rather than solely from the latter. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N