Lotteries, Litigaton, and Education Finance.

In 1993, the state of Georgia instituted a lottery that earmarked new funds for instructional and capital expenditures in public schools. In that same year, Tennessee began court-ordered education finance reforms that were also designed to promote instructional and capital expenditures. Using distri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Southern Economic Journal Vol. 70; no. 3; pp. 584 - 600
Autor principal: Dee, Thomas S.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Southern Economic Association January 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510326255&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510326255
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00384038
        SEJ
      jtl: Southern Economic Journal
      issn: 00384038
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: January 2004
      vid: 70
      iid: 3
      pid: 1482
      pub: Southern Economic Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510326255
        10.2307/4135332
      ppf: 584
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Lotteries, Litigaton, and Education Finance.
      aug:
        au: Dee, Thomas S.
      su:
        Educational finance
        Lotteries
        Education
        Mathematical models
        Georgia
      sug:
        subj:
          Georgia
          Educational finance
          Lotteries
          Education
          Mathematical models
      keyword: Educational policy -- Tennessee
      ab: In 1993, the state of Georgia instituted a lottery that earmarked new funds for instructional and capital expenditures in public schools. In that same year, Tennessee began court-ordered education finance reforms that were also designed to promote instructional and capital expenditures. Using district-level panel data, this study presents empirical evidence on how these disparate policies influenced the patterns of educational revenues by source and expenditures by function. The results suggest that both state policies increased the state aid to the poorest districts and promoted some spending on the targeted functions. However, the results also suggest that these reforms influenced spending in several other functional areas. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N