Constitutional Courts and Legislative-Executive Relations: The Case of Ukraine.
A study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Ukraine's constitutional court in terms of mediating legislative-executive conflict and helping to ensure regime stability since its inception in 1997. Findings revealed that the court has made decisions in favor of both the president and the par...
| Publicado en: | Political Science Quarterly Vol. 119; no. 1; pp. 143 - 170 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Academy of Political Science
Spring 2004
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510331640&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 510331640 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00323195 PSQ jtl: Political Science Quarterly issn: 00323195 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Spring 2004 vid: 119 iid: 1 pid: 5 pub: Academy of Political Science artinfo: ui: 510331640 10.2307/20202308 ppf: 143 ppct: 27 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: T tig: atl: Constitutional Courts and Legislative-Executive Relations: The Case of Ukraine. aug: au: Brown, Trevor L. Wise, Charles R. su: Presidential system Representative government & representation Separation of powers Judicial review sug: subj: Presidential system Representative government & representation Separation of powers Judicial review keyword: Courts -- Ukraine Presidential government Ukraine -- Constitution ab: A study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Ukraine's constitutional court in terms of mediating legislative-executive conflict and helping to ensure regime stability since its inception in 1997. Findings revealed that the court has made decisions in favor of both the president and the parliament, has played a mediating role in disputes between the legislature and executive branches, has managed to diffuse conflicts that threatened the stability of the regime, and has as a result earned respect for its decisions. It was concluded that if constitutional courts are to be as successful at mediating as in Ukraine, they must have extensive judicial review powers, their jurisdiction must be broad enough to encompass most separation of powers issues, and they must not be controlled through the appointment process by either the executive branch or the legislature. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|