Working memory components of the Corsi blocks task.

A computerized version of the Corsi blocks task (Milner, 1971) was assessed for standard forward-recall order (Experiments 1 and 3) and for reversed-recall order (Experiments 2 and 3) either in a single-task or in a dual-task design combined with articulatory suppression, matrix-tapping, random-inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Journal of Psychology Vol. 95; no. 1; pp. 57 - 80
Autores principales: Vandierendonck, André, Kemps, Eva, Fastame, Maria Chiara
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell February 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510344804&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510344804
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00071269
        BJP
      jtl: British Journal of Psychology
      issn: 00071269
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: February 2004
      vid: 95
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510344804
        10.1348/000712604322779460
      ppf: 57
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.4MB
      tig:
        atl: Working memory components of the Corsi blocks task.
      aug:
        au:
          Vandierendonck, André
          Kemps, Eva
          Fastame, Maria Chiara
      su:
        Space perception
        Visual perception
        Short-term memory
      sug:
        subj:
          Space perception
          Visual perception
          Short-term memory
      ab: A computerized version of the Corsi blocks task (Milner, 1971) was assessed for standard forward-recall order (Experiments 1 and 3) and for reversed-recall order (Experiments 2 and 3) either in a single-task or in a dual-task design combined with articulatory suppression, matrix-tapping, random-interval generation or fixed-interval generation as concurrent tasks during the encoding stage. Concurrent performance of the matrix-tapping task impaired memory performance for short as well as for longer block sequences. The random-interval generation task, which loads executive processes, impaired memory performance mainly at intermediate- and longer-sequence lengths, while fixed-interval generation, which is presumed to put no load on executive processing, did not show any effect, Articulatory suppression did not impair memory performance on forward-recall order, but it impaired memory for longer sequences in the backward-recall condition in Experiment 2, but not in Experiment 3. The results are discussed within the context of the working-memory model of Baddeley and Hitch (1974). Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N