Commentary.

Part of a special section on anthropological research on free software or open source software in widely disparate social spaces and global locations. The writer discusses copyright in everyday practice and theory as a spectrum and highlights the immense gap that separates copyright's social and le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Anthropological Quarterly Vol. 77; no. 3; pp. 575 - 581
Autor principal: Brown, Glenn Otis
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: George Washington Institute for Ethnographic Research Summer 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510374135&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510374135
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00035491
        ANQ
      jtl: Anthropological Quarterly
      issn: 00035491
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Summer 2004
      vid: 77
      iid: 3
      pid: 12361
      pub: George Washington Institute for Ethnographic Research
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510374135
        10.1353/anq.2004.0048
      ppf: 575
      ppct: 6
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 257KB
      tig:
        atl: Commentary.
      aug:
        au: Brown, Glenn Otis
      su:
        Copyright of software
        Computers & society
        Intellectual property
      sug:
        subj:
          Copyright of software
          Computers & society
          Intellectual property
      ab: Part of a special section on anthropological research on free software or open source software in widely disparate social spaces and global locations. The writer discusses copyright in everyday practice and theory as a spectrum and highlights the immense gap that separates copyright's social and legal meanings. He emphasizes the crucial contribution of anthropology to the copyright debate. Furthermore, he asserts that although there has been little formal cooperation between lawyers and anthropologists in the field of copyright until now, the more that lawyers come to recognize that the real action in the copyright debate occurs not in the courtroom but in the wilds of culture, the more they should turn to the natives of norms—anthropologist and artists—to formulate plans for a new system of alternative copyright.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N