Rhetorical Virtues: Property, Speech, and the Commons on the World-Wide Web.
Part of a special section on anthropological research on free software or open source software in widely disparate social spaces and global locations. As part of their continuing work on the discourse of intellectual property in the age of digital media and information-based capitalism, the writers...
| Publicado en: | Anthropological Quarterly Vol. 77; no. 3; pp. 559 - 575 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
George Washington Institute for Ethnographic Research
Summer 2004
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510374141&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 510374141 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00035491 ANQ jtl: Anthropological Quarterly issn: 00035491 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Summer 2004 vid: 77 iid: 3 pid: 12361 pub: George Washington Institute for Ethnographic Research artinfo: ui: 510374141 10.1353/anq.2004.0037 ppf: 559 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 760KB tig: atl: Rhetorical Virtues: Property, Speech, and the Commons on the World-Wide Web. aug: au: Coombe, Rosemary J. Herman, Andrew su: Copyright of software Intellectual property Cultural property sug: subj: Copyright of software Intellectual property Cultural property keyword: Bionicle (Game) ab: Part of a special section on anthropological research on free software or open source software in widely disparate social spaces and global locations. As part of their continuing work on the discourse of intellectual property in the age of digital media and information-based capitalism, the writers consider the social dimensions of trademark law. They focus on the lively and frequently angry debate that arose over the Lego Corporation's line of building toys called “Bionicle,” much of the symbolic universe of which Maori activists argued had been appropriated from Maori and other Polynesian cultures. They consider the dialogue between Maori activists and Bionicle fans about the nature of intellectual property, the propriety of cultural appropriation, the scope of the public domain, and the constitution of the cultural commons, and they assess the adequacy of the dominant competing ethos of digital governance for tackling the issues it poses. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|