What makes a good psi target? Three studies of forced-choice ESP varying target emotionality and complexity.

Three experiments studied performance on a 24-trial forced-choice psi task with 12 emotionally unpleasant and 12 neutral targets. The emotional targets consisted of 8 simple black and white line drawings and 4 colorful and more complex pictures; the neutral targets consisted of 12 identical line dr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Parapsychology Vol. 60; pp. 25 - 42
Main Author: Watt, Caroline A.
Format: Article
Published: Rhine Research Center March 1996
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510400339&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510400339
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00223387
        PAY
      jtl: Journal of Parapsychology
      issn: 00223387
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: March 1996
      vid: 60
      pid: 533
      pub: Rhine Research Center
    artinfo:
      ui: 510400339
      ppf: 25
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: What makes a good psi target? Three studies of forced-choice ESP varying target emotionality and complexity.
      aug:
        au: Watt, Caroline A.
      su:
        Extrasensory perception
        Emotions
        Stimulus intensity
      sug:
        subj:
          Extrasensory perception
          Emotions
          Stimulus intensity
      ab: Three experiments studied performance on a 24-trial forced-choice psi task with 12 emotionally unpleasant and 12 neutral targets. The emotional targets consisted of 8 simple black and white line drawings and 4 colorful and more complex pictures; the neutral targets consisted of 12 identical line drawings of a rectangle. Participants made a binary choice as to whether each target was emotional or neutral and the main target variables under study were emotional versus neutral and simple versus complex. Experiment 1 had a GESP design and 48 novice participants. Experiment 2 had a clairvoyance design and 14 experienced participants who had taken part in Experiment 1 and who had then undergone training in techniques reputed to enhance psi performance. Experiment 3 had a clairvoyance design and 75 novice participants. In all three studies participants showed no difference in scoring between emotional and neutral targets once participants' preference for calling “neutral” more often than “emotional” was taken into account. Participants scored nonsignificantly higher for complex as compared to simple emotional targets in Experiments 1 and 2, but Experiment 3 found the opposite trend. Exploratory analyses using participants' individual emotionality ratings of the targets also found little difference in ESP scoring comparing the most to the least emotional targets. Finally, these laboratory findings were related to the study of spontaneous cases. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N