Orbit of influence: spy finance and the black budget.

Although there is a legitimate place for secret intelligence operations in the modern state, political circumstances might suggest that the “intelligence-industrial complex,” like other government-dependent industries, is due for serious downsizing. A strong argument can be made that the cash outla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:American Prospect no. 25; pp. 30 - 37
Main Author: Dreyfuss, Robert
Format: Article
Published: American Prospect March/April 1996
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510401158&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510401158
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10497285
        ANP
      jtl: American Prospect
      issn: 10497285
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: March/April 1996
      iid: 25
      pid: 2396
      pub: American Prospect
    artinfo:
      ui: 510401158
      ppf: 30
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Orbit of influence: spy finance and the black budget.
      aug:
        au: Dreyfuss, Robert
      su:
        United States federal budget
        Defense industries
        Intelligence service
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          United States federal budget
          Defense industries
          Intelligence service
      ab: Although there is a legitimate place for secret intelligence operations in the modern state, political circumstances might suggest that the “intelligence-industrial complex,” like other government-dependent industries, is due for serious downsizing. A strong argument can be made that the cash outlays for the intelligence community's satellite reconnaissance systems and other aspects of its space program could be radically reduced. However, expenditures on the program are sustained by a voracious military appetite for ever greater quantities of intelligence data and by the power of lobbyists for and campaign money from the private industry that engineers, manufactures, and maintains the intelligence-industrial complex. Moreover, the CIA and the Pentagon today, perhaps more than at any other time in their history, are guided by leaders who are devoted to high-technology intelligence systems and who come directly out of industry.
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N