Organized labor and the presidential nominating process: reconsidering the 1980s.

The writer considers union intervention in the presidential nominating process during the 1980s. The early endorsement in 1984 of former vice president Walter Mondale for the Democratic nomination by the American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations implied the dawning of a new...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Presidential Studies Quarterly Vol. 26; pp. 391 - 402
Autor principal: Dark, Taylor E.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Spring 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510406869&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510406869
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03604918
        PRQ
      jtl: Presidential Studies Quarterly
      issn: 03604918
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring 1996
      vid: 26
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui: 510406869
      ppf: 391
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Organized labor and the presidential nominating process: reconsidering the 1980s.
      aug:
        au: Dark, Taylor E.
      su:
        AFL-CIO
        Presidential nominations
        Presidents of the United States
        Labor unions
        Political participation
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          AFL-CIO
          Presidential nominations
          Presidents of the United States
          Labor unions
          Political participation
      ab: The writer considers union intervention in the presidential nominating process during the 1980s. The early endorsement in 1984 of former vice president Walter Mondale for the Democratic nomination by the American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations implied the dawning of a new labor strategy. For the first time since Vice President Hubert Humphrey's campaign for the nomination in 1968, union leaders backed a single candidate from the early stages and guaranteed his selection as the party's nominee. Although it may have appeared that the union's old power broker role had returned, the labor movement was once again divided in 1988 among several candidates and found itself in a weak position to determine the nominee. These two nominating campaigns portray the ongoing possibilities and dangers of the present nominating process for the realization of labor union power. In addition, they illuminate the strategic environment that confronts all interest groups as they strive to influence presidential nominations.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N