Economics as Universal Science.
The argument that economics is superior to other social science disciplines is assessed. It is noted that this argument is supported by the view that economics is more capable analytically and predictively than its fellow disciplines. It is concluded that this is not the case, and that economics s...
| Publicado en: | Social Research Vol. 71; no. 3; pp. 615 - 633 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
New School for Social Research
Fall 2004
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510407430&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 510407430 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0037783X SRE jtl: Social Research issn: 0037783X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Fall 2004 vid: 71 iid: 3 pid: 296 pub: New School for Social Research artinfo: ui: 510407430 ppf: 615 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 958KB tig: atl: Economics as Universal Science. aug: au: Heilbroner, Robert su: Philosophy of economics sug: subj: Philosophy of economics ab: The argument that economics is superior to other social science disciplines is assessed. It is noted that this argument is supported by the view that economics is more capable analytically and predictively than its fellow disciplines. It is concluded that this is not the case, and that economics should be placed on an equal footing with politics and sociology. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|