A Culture of Poverty or the Poverty of a Culture? Informal Settlements and the Debate over the State-Society Relationship in Egypt.

Problems facing informal (“squatter”) settlements in Egypt have increasingly gained public exposure through both media coverage and scholarly debates. Whereas the state public discourse reflects a pretence for developing these areas, this paper, through the study of the relationship between the stat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Middle East Journal Vol. 58; no. 4; pp. 597 - 612
Autor principal: Fahmy, Ninette
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Middle East Journal Autumn 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510407866&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510407866
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00263141
        MEJ
      jtl: Middle East Journal
      issn: 00263141
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Autumn 2004
      vid: 58
      iid: 4
      pid: 613
      pub: Middle East Journal
    artinfo:
      ui: 510407866
      ppf: 597
      ppct: 15
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: A Culture of Poverty or the Poverty of a Culture? Informal Settlements and the Debate over the State-Society Relationship in Egypt.
      aug:
        au: Fahmy, Ninette
      su:
        Individual & state
        Urban poor
        Egypt
      sug:
        subj:
          Egypt
          Individual & state
          Urban poor
      keyword: Squatters -- Egypt
      ab: Problems facing informal (“squatter”) settlements in Egypt have increasingly gained public exposure through both media coverage and scholarly debates. Whereas the state public discourse reflects a pretence for developing these areas, this paper, through the study of the relationship between the state and members living in three urban squatter areas, argues that government response towards squatters takes the following forms: negligence, demolition, relocation, and exploitation. Whereas demolition and relocation take place under exceptional conditions, negligence and exploitation are the most common forms of the state response towards the marginal sector. This exploitation serves the state's public officials in lining their own pockets and provides a rich source of votes for the state political apparatus, which guarantee the continuity of the regime. Thus, a culture characterised by its poverty is created among squatters where individual and personal interests attain precedence over communal interests, leading to more exploitation and corruption, which impedes the government developmental policies and programs, leading to a further weakening of the state. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N