A Right to Be Lazy? Busyness in Retrospective.

Part of a special issue on busyness. The writer reviews the history of work time and leisure. Many people in the late 19th century, including Marx's son-in-law Paul Lafargue, believed that busyness was a false doctrine of modern capitalism and that overwork caused production gluts and the irration...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Social Research Vol. 72; no. 2; pp. 263 - 287
Autor principal: Cross, Gary
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: New School for Social Research Summer 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510434752&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510434752
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0037783X
        SRE
      jtl: Social Research
      issn: 0037783X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Summer 2005
      vid: 72
      iid: 2
      pid: 296
      pub: New School for Social Research
    artinfo:
      ui: 510434752
      ppf: 263
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.1MB
      tig:
        atl: A Right to Be Lazy? Busyness in Retrospective.
      aug:
        au: Cross, Gary
      su:
        Right to be lazy [Treatise]: Lafargue, Paul
        Sedentary behavior
        Industrial revolution
        Working hours
        Leisure
        Philosophy
      sug:
        subj:
          Right to be lazy [Treatise]: Lafargue, Paul
          Sedentary behavior
          Industrial revolution
          Working hours
          Leisure
          Philosophy
      keyword: Lafargue, Paul, 1842-1911 -- Work -- Right to be lazy
      ab: Part of a special issue on busyness. The writer reviews the history of work time and leisure. Many people in the late 19th century, including Marx's son-in-law Paul Lafargue, believed that busyness was a false doctrine of modern capitalism and that overwork caused production gluts and the irrational excesses of the rich. However, strong cultural, technological, political, and even biological forces have since combined to not only make people busy but to make the virtues and rights of “laziness” unintelligible. There are many short-term benefits from the busyness culture and many long-term barriers to making other choices, but the truth is that the personal costs of busyness are huge, namely the long-term loss of health and social relationships.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N