Assumptions matter: reflections on the Kanbur typology.

In contradistinction to Ravi Kanbur s (2003) summarization of a recent conference on qualitative and quantitative poverty analysis in which he proposed a typology of differences between ‘qual and quant’ approaches, I argue that key elements in this typology are derivative of more basic distinctions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Focaal no. 45; pp. 18 - 33
Main Author: Shaffer, Paul
Format: Article
Published: Berghahn Books 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510447756&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510447756
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09201297
        LSZ
      jtl: Focaal
      issn: 09201297
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2005
      iid: 45
      pid: 1130
      pub: Berghahn Books
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510447756
        10.3167/092012905780909306
      ppf: 18
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 4.1MB
      tig:
        atl: Assumptions matter: reflections on the Kanbur typology.
      aug:
        au: Shaffer, Paul
      su:
        Social science methodology
        Social theory
      sug:
        subj:
          Social science methodology
          Social theory
      ab: In contradistinction to Ravi Kanbur s (2003) summarization of a recent conference on qualitative and quantitative poverty analysis in which he proposed a typology of differences between ‘qual and quant’ approaches, I argue that key elements in this typology are derivative of more basic distinctions in the philosophy of social science between three research programs: empiricism/positivism, hermeneutics, and critical theory/critical hermeneutics. The point is not simply of academic interest but has practical implications for aspects of poverty analysis, including numeric transformation of data, assessment of the validity of empirical findings, and inferring policy implications from research results. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N