I Think, Therefore I Err.

Part of a special issue on the consequences of errors in the social and natural sciences. The research that experimental psychologists have conducted on human errors in an effort to infer laws of cognition—of perception, memory, and thought—is discussed. It is argued that the study of cognitive er...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social Research Vol. 72; no. 1; pp. 195 - 219
Main Author: Gigerenzer, Gerd
Format: Article
Published: New School for Social Research Spring 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510488060&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510488060
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0037783X
        SRE
      jtl: Social Research
      issn: 0037783X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring 2005
      vid: 72
      iid: 1
      pid: 296
      pub: New School for Social Research
    artinfo:
      ui: 510488060
      ppf: 195
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.2MB
      tig:
        atl: I Think, Therefore I Err.
      aug:
        au: Gigerenzer, Gerd
      su:
        Psychology, Experimental
        Errors
        Logical fallacies
        Optical illusions
      sug:
        subj:
          Psychology, Experimental
          Errors
          Logical fallacies
          Optical illusions
      ab: Part of a special issue on the consequences of errors in the social and natural sciences. The research that experimental psychologists have conducted on human errors in an effort to infer laws of cognition—of perception, memory, and thought—is discussed. It is argued that the study of cognitive errors has focused on a logical definition of errors and, because of the tendency to confuse forms of human intelligence that transcend logic with foolish gaffes, reveals little about cognitive laws. It is concluded that, if this type of logical analysis is replaced by an ecological approach, for which the investigation of visual illusions is a prototype, a window into the mind can begin to be opened.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N