Not Getting Burned: The Importance of Fire Prevention in Forest Management.

We extend existing stand-level models of forest landowner behavior in the presence of fire risk to include the level and timing of fuel management activities. These activities reduce losses if a stand ignites. Based on simulations, we find the standard result that fire risk reduces the optimal rotat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Land Economics Vol. 81; no. 2; pp. 284 - 303
Main Authors: Amacher, Gregory S., Malik, Arun S., Haight, Robert G.
Format: Article
Published: University of Wisconsin Press May 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510496840&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510496840
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00237639
        LAE
      jtl: Land Economics
      issn: 00237639
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May 2005
      vid: 81
      iid: 2
      pid: 249
      pub: University of Wisconsin Press
    artinfo:
      ui: 510496840
      ppf: 284
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.6MB
      tig:
        atl: Not Getting Burned: The Importance of Fire Prevention in Forest Management.
      aug:
        au:
          Amacher, Gregory S.
          Malik, Arun S.
          Haight, Robert G.
      su:
        Fire prevention
        Forest landowners
      sug:
        subj:
          Fire prevention
          Forest landowners
      ab: We extend existing stand-level models of forest landowner behavior in the presence of fire risk to include the level and timing of fuel management activities. These activities reduce losses if a stand ignites. Based on simulations, we find the standard result that fire risk reduces the optimal rotation age does not hold when landowners use fuel management. Instead, the optimal rotation age rises as fire risk increases. The optimal planting density decreases. The level of intermediate fuel treatment, but not its timing, is sensitive to the magnitude of fire risk. Cost-sharing is shown to be an effective instrument for encouraging fuel treatment. (JEL Q23) Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N