Determinism and Forbearance.

The writer discusses Peter Strawson's celebrated essay, “Freedom and Resentment,” which appeared in Free Will, 1982, pp. 59–80. He contends that “Freedom and Resentment” generates a number of questions that must be addressed before Strawson's moral psychology can provide insights into the nature of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Social Theory & Practice Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. 97 - 136
Autor principal: Guldmann, Rony
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Florida State University, Dept. of Philosophy January 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510510786&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510510786
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0037802X
        STP
      jtl: Social Theory & Practice
      issn: 0037802X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: January 2006
      vid: 32
      iid: 1
      pid: 150
      pub: Florida State University, Dept. of Philosophy
    artinfo:
      ui: 510510786
      ppf: 97
      ppct: 39
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 2.5MB
      tig:
        atl: Determinism and Forbearance.
      aug:
        au: Guldmann, Rony
      su:
        Responsibility
        Agent (Philosophy)
      sug:
        subj:
          Responsibility
          Agent (Philosophy)
      ab: The writer discusses Peter Strawson's celebrated essay, “Freedom and Resentment,” which appeared in Free Will, 1982, pp. 59–80. He contends that “Freedom and Resentment” generates a number of questions that must be addressed before Strawson's moral psychology can provide insights into the nature of human relationships. He asserts that Strawson pays insufficient attention to the leeway humans have in choosing their attitudes toward others, and that he conceptualizes the problem of moral responsibility in a manner that risks obscuring important questions about how and why humans should hold others responsible for their actions.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N