Measures to fight chemical/biological terrorism: how little is enough?

Part of a special section on chemical and biological terrorism. The writer replies to 24 commentaries on his article “Chemical/Biological Terrorism: Coping with a New Threat,” all of which appear in this issue. The writer contends that the issue of possible motivations of terrorist organizations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Politics & the Life Sciences Vol. 15; pp. 240 - 248
Autor principal: Tucker, Jonathan B.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Association for Politics & the Life Sciences September 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510517407&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510517407
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07309384
        PFC
      jtl: Politics & the Life Sciences
      issn: 07309384
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: September 1996
      vid: 15
      pid: 15955
      pub: Association for Politics & the Life Sciences
    artinfo:
      ui: 510517407
      ppf: 240
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Measures to fight chemical/biological terrorism: how little is enough?
      aug:
        au: Tucker, Jonathan B.
      su:
        Oumu Shinrikyo (Religious organization)
        Chemical weapons
        Biological weapons
        Counterterrorism
      sug:
        subj:
          Oumu Shinrikyo (Religious organization)
          Chemical weapons
          Biological weapons
          Counterterrorism
      ab: Part of a special section on chemical and biological terrorism. The writer replies to 24 commentaries on his article “Chemical/Biological Terrorism: Coping with a New Threat,” all of which appear in this issue. The writer contends that the issue of possible motivations of terrorist organizations in resorting to chemical and biological (C/B) weapons is complex and that his analysis was simplistic in seeking to draw a sharp distinction between groups motivated by political ends versus religious or racist ideology. He argues that what is new about the threat of C/B terrorism is that it potentially grants a small number of individuals the capacity to disturb society on an immense scale. In addition, he asserts that the largest threat comes from terrorists motivated by religious fanaticism or racial hatred, who regard violence and murder directed against a specific race or class of people as justifiable. Finally, he addresses some of the criticisms of his technical arguments and policy recommendations.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N