The independent role of the probation officer at sentencing and in applying Koon v. United States.

The writer examines the existing legal authority defining the role of the probation officer at sentencing and argues that preservation of an independent role for these officers is in the sentencing court's interest in order to ensure that the court receives objective information. She defines object...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Federal Probation Vol. 60; pp. 71 - 80
Autor principal: Goodwin, Catharine M.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Superintendent of Documents September 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510518618&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510518618
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00149128
        FEP
      jtl: Federal Probation
      issn: 00149128
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: September 1996
      vid: 60
      pid: 372
      pub: Superintendent of Documents
    artinfo:
      ui: 510518618
      ppf: 71
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: The independent role of the probation officer at sentencing and in applying Koon v. United States.
      aug:
        au: Goodwin, Catharine M.
      su:
        Criminal sentencing
        Decision making in prosecution
        Occupational roles
        Decision making
        Probation
        Probation officers
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          Criminal sentencing
          Decision making in prosecution
          Occupational roles
          Decision making
          Probation
          Probation officers
      keyword: United States -- Supreme Court -- Decisions
      ab: The writer examines the existing legal authority defining the role of the probation officer at sentencing and argues that preservation of an independent role for these officers is in the sentencing court's interest in order to ensure that the court receives objective information. She defines objective information as information that is separate from that agreed to or stipulated by the parties, upon which the court makes the necessary sentencing determinations. She explores new criteria for assessing when a departure is appropriate that are set out in Koon v. United States and discusses the renewed significance of the probation officer's role in putting into effect these criteria in the presentence report.
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N