Using event history analysis to model delay in grievance arbitration.

Applying event history analysis to data on a sample of arbitration awards in Alberta in 1985-88, the authors investigate the factors that contribute to delay in different stages of the grievance arbitration process. The analysis shows that a different combination of factors explains delay at each s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Industrial & Labor Relations Review Vol. 50; pp. 105 - 122
Autores principales: Ponak, Allen, Zerbe, Wilfred, Rose, Sarah
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cornell University October 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510521647&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510521647
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00197939
        ILR
      jtl: Industrial & Labor Relations Review
      issn: 00197939
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: October 1996
      vid: 50
      pid: 140
      pub: Cornell University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510521647
        10.2307/2524392
      ppf: 105
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Using event history analysis to model delay in grievance arbitration.
      aug:
        au:
          Ponak, Allen
          Zerbe, Wilfred
          Rose, Sarah
      su:
        Labor arbitration
        Event history analysis
        Grievance procedures
        Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Canada
          Labor arbitration
          Event history analysis
          Grievance procedures
      ab: Applying event history analysis to data on a sample of arbitration awards in Alberta in 1985-88, the authors investigate the factors that contribute to delay in different stages of the grievance arbitration process. The analysis shows that a different combination of factors explains delay at each stage of the process. The length of time from the filing of a grievance to referral to arbitration is a function of the complexity and type of the issue; delay in arbitrator selection is associated with the use of legal counsel and the size of the arbitration board; scheduling delay is associated with the nature of the grievance and the use of outside legal counsel; and delay in preparing the decision is linked to the complexity and type of the issue, board size, the presence of legal counsel, and the arbitrator's workload. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N