In defense of negative campaigning.

Contrary to popular wisdom, the writer argues that negative campaigning is a necessary and legitimate part of any election and that American politics and the growing movement to reform election campaigns will be a great deal better off when this fact is acknowledged. He discusses the value of negat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Political Science Quarterly Vol. 111; pp. 437 - 456
Autor principal: Mayer, William G.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Academy of Political Science Fall 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510524050&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510524050
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00323195
        PSQ
      jtl: Political Science Quarterly
      issn: 00323195
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Fall 1996
      vid: 111
      pid: 5
      pub: Academy of Political Science
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510524050
        10.2307/2151970
      ppf: 437
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: In defense of negative campaigning.
      aug:
        au: Mayer, William G.
      su:
        Political advertising
        Political campaigns
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          Political advertising
          Political campaigns
      ab: Contrary to popular wisdom, the writer argues that negative campaigning is a necessary and legitimate part of any election and that American politics and the growing movement to reform election campaigns will be a great deal better off when this fact is acknowledged. He discusses the value of negative campaigning, the need for far greater care and clarity in thinking and writing about negative campaigning, the relevance of candidate character and behavior, the role of the media, and what restrictions on negative campaigning would mean for American politics. He concludes that the attempt to stamp out negative campaigning deals a double blow to any effort to improve the quality of future American election campaigns: It attempts to deny the voters significant information that is relevant to their decisions and helps to divert attention from the many serious problems that genuinely afflict campaigns.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N