“It's the environment, stupid!” Clinton and the environment.

By making the economy the litmus test of his presidency, President Clinton has been forced to deal with environmental problems in a new and more economically friendly manner. Circumstances beyond Clinton's control have reduced his environmental record to primarily a series of presidential vetoes, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Presidential Studies Quarterly Vol. 27; pp. 39 - 52
Main Author: Nie, Martin A.
Format: Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Winter 1997
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510541198&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510541198
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03604918
        PRQ
      jtl: Presidential Studies Quarterly
      issn: 03604918
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Winter 1997
      vid: 27
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui: 510541198
      ppf: 39
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: “It's the environment, stupid!” Clinton and the environment.
      aug:
        au: Nie, Martin A.
      su:
        Clinton, Bill, 1946-
        Environmental policy
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          Environmental policy
          Clinton, Bill, 1946-
      ab: By making the economy the litmus test of his presidency, President Clinton has been forced to deal with environmental problems in a new and more economically friendly manner. Circumstances beyond Clinton's control have reduced his environmental record to primarily a series of presidential vetoes, and the constraints of a divided government have partly caused his environmental agenda to be usurped by Republican initiatives in Congress. Clinton regularly cites his “common-sense” approach to the environment, but he has been unable to advance it. Rather, he has been demoted to the role of environmental budget protector and the last line of environmental defense. In his second term, Clinton should perhaps try to convince a reticent and unfriendly Congress that accepting his environmental agenda will prove politically beneficial.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N