From decency to civility by way of economics: “first let's eat and then talk of right and wrong”.

Part of a special issue on some of the provocative issues that inhere in the idea of a “decent society” and that are raised by Avishai Margalit's book The Decent Society. The writer considers what the remedies are for indecent, uncivil societies enmeshed in a global economy that permeates local pol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Social Research Vol. 64; pp. 112 - 131
Autor principal: Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: New School for Social Research Spring 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510556461&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510556461
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0037783X
        SRE
      jtl: Social Research
      issn: 0037783X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring 1997
      vid: 64
      pid: 296
      pub: New School for Social Research
    artinfo:
      ui: 510556461
      ppf: 112
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: From decency to civility by way of economics: “first let's eat and then talk of right and wrong”.
      aug:
        au: Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg
      su:
        Margalit, Avishai, 1939-
        Social ethics
        Humiliation
        Social criticism
        Marxist criticism
        Economics & ethics
      sug:
        subj:
          Social ethics
          Humiliation
          Social criticism
          Marxist criticism
          Economics & ethics
          Margalit, Avishai, 1939-
      ab: Part of a special issue on some of the provocative issues that inhere in the idea of a “decent society” and that are raised by Avishai Margalit's book The Decent Society. The writer considers what the remedies are for indecent, uncivil societies enmeshed in a global economy that permeates local political and social institutions and that affects the categories and motives of individuals. She offers a Marxist analysis combined with a critique of the politics of cultural identity, demonstrating that when the overlapping consensus on decency erodes and deep economic divisions threaten political unity, deliberate attempts should be made to strengthen the intersecting networks of civic alliances. She contends that focusing on the mistaken essentialism of cultural, racial, gender, or religious identity is likely to entrench differences. Furthermore, she maintains that such practice runs the risk of turning them into differences about the conditions for decency.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N