How important are linguistic factors in word skipping during reading?

The probability of skipping a word is influenced by its processing ease. For instance, a word that is predictable from the preceding context is skipped more often than an unpredictable word. A meta-analysis of studies examining this predictability effect reported effect sizes ranging from 0 to 13%,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:British Journal of Psychology Vol. 98; no. 1; pp. 157 - 172
Main Authors: Drieghe, Denis, Desmet, Timothy, Brysbaert, Marc
Format: Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell February 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510579290&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510579290
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00071269
        BJP
      jtl: British Journal of Psychology
      issn: 00071269
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: February 2007
      vid: 98
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510579290
        10.1348/000712606X111258
      ppf: 157
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.1MB
      tig:
        atl: How important are linguistic factors in word skipping during reading?
      aug:
        au:
          Drieghe, Denis
          Desmet, Timothy
          Brysbaert, Marc
      su:
        Psycholinguistics
        Eye movements
        Reading level of students
      sug:
        subj:
          Psycholinguistics
          Eye movements
          Reading level of students
      ab: The probability of skipping a word is influenced by its processing ease. For instance, a word that is predictable from the preceding context is skipped more often than an unpredictable word. A meta-analysis of studies examining this predictability effect reported effect sizes ranging from 0 to 13%, with an average of 8%. One study does not fit within this picture and reported 23% more skipping of Dutch pronouns in sentences in which the pronoun had no disambiguating value (e.g. ‘Mary was envious of Helen because she never looked so good’) than in sentences where it did have a disambiguating value (e.g. ‘Mary was envious of Albert because she never looked so good’). We re-examined this ambiguity in Dutch using a task that more closely resembles normal reading and observed only a 9% difference in skipping of the pronoun, bringing this linguistic effect in line with the other findings. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N