The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: Evidence from a “Judicial Experiment”.

We use panel data for 50 states during the 1960-2000 period to examine the deterrent effect of capital punishment, using the moratorium as a judicial experiment.” We compare murder rates immediately before and after changes in states' death penalty laws, drawing on cross-state variations in the timi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Economic Inquiry Vol. 44; no. 3; pp. 512 - 536
Autores principales: Dezhbakhsh, Hashem, Shepherd, Joanna M.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell July 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510602059&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510602059
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00952583
        EIQ
      jtl: Economic Inquiry
      issn: 00952583
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: July 2006
      vid: 44
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510602059
        10.1093/ei/cbj032
      ppf: 512
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.8MB
      tig:
        atl: The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: Evidence from a “Judicial Experiment”.
      aug:
        au:
          Dezhbakhsh, Hashem
          Shepherd, Joanna M.
      su:
        Executions & executioners
        Capital punishment
        Punishment in crime deterrence
      sug:
        subj:
          Executions & executioners
          Capital punishment
          Punishment in crime deterrence
      ab: We use panel data for 50 states during the 1960-2000 period to examine the deterrent effect of capital punishment, using the moratorium as a judicial experiment.” We compare murder rates immediately before and after changes in states' death penalty laws, drawing on cross-state variations in the timing and duration of the moratorium. The regression analysis supplementing the before-and-after comparisons disentangles the effect of lifting the moratorium on murder from the effect of actual executions on murder. Results suggest that capital punishment has a deterrent effect, and that executions have a distinct effect which compounds the deterrent effect of merely (re) instating the death penalty. The finding is robust across 96 regression models. (JEL C1, K1) Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N