Morality Influences How People Apply the Ignorance of the Law Defense.

In four empirical studies, we showed that laypeople apply the ignorance of the law defense differently depending on the perceived morality of the defendant's course of conduct at the time of the illegal act. Moral and neutral defendants who pled ignorance of the law were afforded leniency, whereas i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Law & Society Review Vol. 41; no. 4; pp. 819 - 865
Autores principales: Alter, Adam L., Kernochan, Julia, Darley, John M.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell December 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510722948&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510722948
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00239216
        LSR
      jtl: Law & Society Review
      issn: 00239216
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: December 2007
      vid: 41
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510722948
        10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00327.x
      ppf: 819
      ppct: 46
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 20.1MB
      tig:
        atl: Morality Influences How People Apply the Ignorance of the Law Defense.
      aug:
        au:
          Alter, Adam L.
          Kernochan, Julia
          Darley, John M.
      su:
        Criminal defense
        Law & ethics
        Ignorance (Law)
      sug:
        subj:
          Criminal defense
          Law & ethics
          Ignorance (Law)
      ab: In four empirical studies, we showed that laypeople apply the ignorance of the law defense differently depending on the perceived morality of the defendant's course of conduct at the time of the illegal act. Moral and neutral defendants who pled ignorance of the law were afforded leniency, whereas immoral defendants were sentenced as though they were not ignorant, even when defendants in all three conditions violated identical laws. These findings suggest that laypeople adopt a just deserts approach to criminal law, which influences their responsiveness to a criminal defendant's claim to be ignorant of the law. We discuss the implications of these findings for criminal law and argue that legal doctrine should reflect laypeople's moral intuitions. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N