The Lessons of Wrongful Convictions.

It is difficult to acknowledge the limitations of a criminal justice process where wrongful convictions can occur without wanting to prevent future errors. Nonetheless, much of the literature concerning wrongful convictions addresses the nature of these errors rather than addressing reforms. Many...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Criminal Justice Ethics Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 2 - 7
Autor principal: Gould, Jon B.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Winter/Spring 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510739013&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510739013
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0731129X
        CRJ
      jtl: Criminal Justice Ethics
      issn: 0731129X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Winter/Spring 2008
      vid: 27
      iid: 1
      pid: 337
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510739013
        10.1080/0731129X.2008.9992221
      ppf: 2
      ppct: 5
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 2MB
      tig:
        atl: The Lessons of Wrongful Convictions.
      aug:
        au: Gould, Jon B.
      su:
        Judicial error
        Criminal justice system
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          Judicial error
          Criminal justice system
      ab: It is difficult to acknowledge the limitations of a criminal justice process where wrongful convictions can occur without wanting to prevent future errors. Nonetheless, much of the literature concerning wrongful convictions addresses the nature of these errors rather than addressing reforms. Many of those who do address reforms call for the creation of state commissions to investigate wrongful convictions, post-conviction DNA testing, improved practices for eyewitness identification, and the elimination of spurious science in court rooms. The two most pressing reforms are generally accepted to be electronically recording custodial interrogations, and changing eyewitness identification procedures. Getting these reforms enacted, however, will mean appealing to the self-interest of the general populace.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N